By Forum staff writer
A governance lecturer at the Institute of Public Administration and Management IPAM, Dr Victor Moinina, has warned that choosing national leaders based on their financial strength rather than competence and integrity could deepen corruption in public office.
Speaking on AYV On Sunday, Dr Moinina said that while some people believe a financially strong president is less likely to steal public funds, the reality of governance shows a more complex and dangerous picture. According to him, the presidency is already a very powerful institution, and personal wealth does not automatically translate into good leadership or clean governance.
“If we choose leaders based on their financial power, it may seem advantageous to have a financially buoyant president. However, the presidency is a powerful institution on its own,” he said. “The president appoints ministers, and when those appointees or followers are not financially secure, that is where corruption can begin.”
Dr Moinina explained that political systems often reward loyalty over merit, especially after elections. He noted that many individuals who support political campaigns expect appointments or access to state resources as compensation for their efforts. When such individuals are appointed to public office without the required competence or financial stability, the temptation to misuse public funds becomes high.
He further stressed that corruption is rarely driven by one individual alone, but by networks created within government. A president may be wealthy, he said, but if those around him are struggling financially and lack strong ethical values, they may abuse their offices to enrich themselves and their associates.
The governance lecturer also criticised the growing culture of equating leadership quality with money. He said that this mindset weakens democratic values and sidelines capable citizens who may not be wealthy but have strong ideas, integrity, and a commitment to public service.
Dr Moinina called on voters to focus more on leadership records, vision, and character rather than financial displays during election periods. He warned that excessive campaign spending often creates pressure on leaders to recover costs once in office, which can further encourage corruption.
He also urged political parties to strengthen internal democracy and promote merit based appointments if elected into power. According to him, strong institutions, clear accountability systems, and ethical leadership are more effective in fighting corruption than relying on the personal wealth of a president.
Dr Moinina concluded by reminding citizens that good governance depends on collective responsibility. He said the fight against corruption must involve leaders, institutions, and the public working together to protect national resources and promote transparency for sustainable development.
